MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161161251

Efficient blind speech signal separation combining independent component analysis and beamforming

2007· article· en· W2161161251 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Qiongfeng Pan, T. Aboulnasr

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind signal separationBeamformingIndependent component analysisComputer scienceDirection of arrivalSpeech recognitionSource separationInterference (communication)Independence (probability theory)AlgorithmFrequency domainSIGNAL (programming language)Time domainComputational complexity theoryExploitPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsMathematicsComputer visionStatisticsChannel (broadcasting)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blind Source Separation (BSS) algorithms can increasingly separate speech signals utilizing time and frequency domain information and beamforming (BF ) algorithms using spatial information from different point of views. BSS exploits a strong statistical condition including independence between source signals, while the popular BF approach utilizes the spatial information about the mixing system and/or source signals. In beamforming stage, the Directions of Arrival (DOA) of sources of interest are estimated blindly and then beamformers are constructed to extract signals from these directions. In the BSS stage, frequency domain convolutive algorithm is utilized to further reduce the interference in the given direction and improve the separation performance. Compared with existing systems, the proposed approach significantly reduces the computational complexity while maintaining comparable separation performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207