Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, les auteurs analysent l'évolution et le développement du concept de communauté thérapeutique dans le monde anglo-saxon. Dans une première partie, ils définissent ce concept et ses caractéristiques. Ensuite, ils explicitent les concepts-clés sous-jacents à l'intervention thérapeutique dans une communauté typique (l'hôpital Belmont de Maxwell Jones), soit l'organisation sociale, le leadership, la prise de décision, le feedback et l'apprentissage social. Dans une deuxième partie, ils explicitent les critiques de Mosher et Menn, de Berke et de Sassolas envers le traitement de la psychose pratiqué dans le système de soins institutionnel, critiques qui peuvent se résumer sous les termes suivants : le modèle théorique prédominant (le modèle médical), le nombre, la structure sociale et l'utilisation des médicaments. Finalement, ils illustrent l'approche proposée par ces thérapeutes-théoriciens, approche basée sur la conception que la psychose est compréhensible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".