MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161188308 · doi:10.1002/aic.11010

Measurements and CFD simulations of gas holdup and liquid velocity in novel airlift membrane contactor

2006· article· en· W2161188308 on OpenAlexafffund
Babak Jajuee, Argyrios Margaritis, Dimitre Karamanev, M.A. Bergougnou, Shokrollah Karimian

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsContactorMechanicsComputational fluid dynamicsAirliftVolume of fluid methodBubbleMembraneMultiphase flowFlow (mathematics)VelocimetryMaterials scienceChemistryThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Liquid velocity and gas holdup were measured in a 690L pilot‐scale rectangular airlift contactor, divided into aerated and nonaerated sections by two vertical rectangular polyester textile membranes. Horizontal flow through the porous membranes complicates flow fields to such an extent that conventional models cannot predict thoroughly velocity profile in the contactor. Experimental data obtained from laser doppler velocimetry (LDV) method were compared with numerical finite volume method (FVM), in order to determine the velocity profile in the downcomer zone of the contactor. In formulating the data, a realistic set of boundary conditions was implemented in the numerical method, resulted in satisfactory agreement between theory and experiment. The effects of the distance between the rectangular membranes and air bubble size on the velocity profile were also studied. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207