Novel method for communications using orthogonal division duplexing of signals (ODD)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As mobile radio systems expand their role in global communications, there is a need for both increased efficiency and an ability to operate in a variety of arbitrary unpaired spectrum assignments. While traditional mobile systems are mostly operated with separated transmit and receive spectrum assignments, these assignments are becoming more difficult to find for new systems among the crowded radio spectrum. Developing a radio system that is suitable for an unpaired spectrum assignment and that can also provide rapid availability of channel information for adaptive transmissions is thus a significant goal. The paper introduces a novel concept, which we refer to as orthogonal division duplexing (ODD), to address these issues. The ODD technique interleaves multiple orthogonal carriers in the same band for transmission and reception. These orthogonal carriers are produced using techniques similar to those used for OFDM. Using the same channel for both transmission and reception enables the channel conditions to be rapidly and accurately estimated by each transceiver, eliminating the delays or errors associated with traditional channel reporting techniques. The ODD transmission system is particularly well suited to multimedia high-speed mobile communications and may be designed to be adaptable to asymmetric traffic flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it