MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161216942 · doi:10.4161/pri.2.2.6710

The irreversible binding of amyloid peptide substrates to insulin-degrading enzyme

2008· review· en· W2161216942 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matías B. de Tullio, Laura Morelli, Eduardo M. Castaño

Bibliographic record

VenuePrion · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchool of Medicine, New York UniversityYork University
KeywordsInsulin-degrading enzymeAmyloid (mycology)PeptideEnzymeChemistryBiochemistryInsulinBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) is a conserved Zn(2+)metalloendopeptidase involved in insulin degradation and in the maintenance of brain steady-state levels of amyloid beta peptide (Abeta) of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our recent demonstration that IDE and Abeta are capable of forming a stoichiometric and extremely stable complex raises several intriguing possibilities regarding the role of this unique protein-peptide interaction in physiological and pathological conditions. These include a protective cellular function of IDE as a "dead-end chaperone" alternative to its proteolytic activity and the potential impact of the irreversible binding of Abeta to IDE upon its role as a varicella zoster virus receptor. In a pathological context, the implications for insulin signaling and its relationship to AD pathogenesis are discussed. Moreover, our findings warrant further research regarding a possible general and novel interaction between amyloidogenic peptides and other Zn(2+)metallopeptidases with an IDE-like fold and a substrate conformation-dependent recognition mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrionSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207