Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article classique de Georg Lukàcs sur Illusions perdues (1935) a fixé l’image d’un critique littéraire « exploité prostitué » par force de la marchandisation capitaliste de la littérature. Lukàcs reconnaît par là l’appartenance du critique à la chaîne de production du livre et donc son rôle de médiateur de l’oeuvre littéraire. Mais il méconnaît une partie essentielle de la relation critique telle qu’elle apparaît autour de 1830 : les louanges se donnent aussi souvent qu’elles se vendent, soit dans l’espoir plus ou moins conscient d’un échange de bons procédés entre écrivains-journalistes, soit par esprit de « camaraderie littéraire ». Cet article se penche sur l’ambivalence, à l’époque romantique, des représentations du critique littéraire, que l’on voit verser tantôt du côté de la vénalité, tantôt du côté du don de soi et de son texte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".