MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Catastrophic microangiopathy induced by high‐titre factor VIII inhibitors after liver transplantation for haemophilia A with cirrhosis

2005· article· en· W2161244147 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Khakhar, Ning Chan, David Allan, Subrata Chakrabarti, Vivian C. McAlister

Bibliographic record

VenueHaemophilia · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic microangiopathyHaemophilia ALiver transplantationCirrhosisImmunosuppressionTransplantationHaemophiliaImmunologyGastroenterologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liver transplantation may induce immune tolerance to factor VIII inhibitors but de novo development of inhibitors after transplantation may cause intractable haemorrhage. We report a patient with mild haemophilia A and high-titre FVIII inhibitors who received an orthotopic liver transplantation for complications of hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Recombinant activated FVII was used in addition to routine haemostatic agents. Conventional immunosuppression was supplemented with antithymocyte globulin and cyclophosphamide. FVIII inhibitors disappeared from the circulation with liver transplantation but they were found to have bound to the graft endothelium, which became activated and induced catastrophic microangiopathy. A subsequent anamnestic response resulted in FVIII inhibitor titres of 1000 Bethesda Units. Uncontrollable haemorrhage persisted until the recipient's death. In patients with high-titre FVIII inhibitors resilient desensitization is required before liver transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaemophiliaSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207