MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161261329 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2009.5316309

A hybrid control method for three-phase grid-connected inverters with high quality power

2009· article· en· W2161261329 on OpenAlexaff
Zitao Wang, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsPulse-width modulationInverterController (irrigation)Three-phaseNonlinear systemVoltageComputer sciencePower (physics)GridEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel control method for three-phase grid-connected inverters used in distributed generation systems. The control system is divided into linear and nonlinear parts. The nonlinear part is further divided into predictable and unpredictable parts. For the linear part, a proportional (P) controller provides output current deadbeat control so that the output current can follow its reference in each pulse width modulation (PWM) period. For the predictable nonlinear part, real-time sampling and predictive techniques are employed to reduce influences of grid voltage harmonics and control delays. An integral (I) controller eliminates the effects of both the unpredictable nonlinear parts and the errors of the P controller on predicting output voltage vector so that the output current closely follows its reference. Further more, the influence of grid voltage harmonics on the inverter output current is analyzed, and the effective method to reduce its influence is developed. Experimental results show that the proposed current control method provides the inverter with an excellent steady-state response and an extremely fast dynamic response, while the quality of the inverter output current is very high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207