MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161294075 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1993.298622

Acceleration of back propagation through initial weight pre-training with delta rule

2002· article· en· W2161294075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Neural Networks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackpropagationConvergence (economics)AccelerationTraining (meteorology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A training strategy for backpropagation (BP) neural networks, named delta pre-training (DPT), is proposed. The core of the training strategy is based on pre-training the initial weights for BP networks using the delta rule, instead of using random values. After pre-training, the normal BP training procedure is carried out to complete network training. With the DPT, the convergence rate for training BP networks can be significantly improved. Since the DPT deals only with initial weight settings, most variations of the standard BP algorithm can be combined with the DPT so as to further speed up convergence. With regards to on-chip learning in VLSI implementations, only a little additional circuitry is required for the pre-training phase with the DPT. Simulation results using the proposed training method show its superiority over previous methods.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it