MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161304067 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1998.745549

New reconfigurable ultrasonic enuresis monitoring system

2002· article· en· W2161304067 on OpenAlexaff
P. Beauchamp-Parent, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnuresisALARMUrinationNocturnalComputer scienceMedicineEngineeringUrologyElectrical engineeringUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nocturnal enuresis (bed-wetting) is a common disorder for children between the ages of 5 and 15. Though the problem usually clears up on its own, nocturnal enuresis sometime leads to serious psychological and social consequences if not dealt with properly. Behavior modification approaches, such as the enuresis alarm system, have been clinically proven to be the only nocturnal enuresis treatment strategy with persistent effectiveness. Available enuresis alarm systems, which condition the child to anticipate micturition, do not prevent bed-wetting during therapy. This paper describes the design of a new reconfigurable miniaturized ultrasonic monitor which wakens the patient a short time before his bladder reaches a critical volume (start of micturition). The detection approach is based on the evaluation of the biggest bladder's depth using an A mode pulse/echo technique. This enuresis alarm system is reconfigurable to adjust the threshold depth according to the child's bladder morphology. A 4/spl times/16 character LCD screen has been implemented to validate measurements performed during the upcoming clinical evaluation of the device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207