MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161322973 · doi:10.1139/s04-018

First flush pollution load of urban stormwater runoff

2004· article· en· W2161322973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amir Taebi, Ronald L. Droste

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirst flushSurface runoffEnvironmental scienceSuspended solidsStormwaterTotal suspended solidsPollutantChemical oxygen demandHydrology (agriculture)PollutionStormUrban runoffBiochemical oxygen demandWater qualityEnvironmental engineeringWastewaterEcologyGeographyMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a storm event, a first flush (FF) phenomenon occurs when most of the pollution load is transported in the initial part of the event discharged volume. The objectives of the study were to consider its severity for a number of pollutants as well as to recognize rainfall–runoff characteristics that influence it. The study was conducted in a semi-arid region of a mixed residential and commercial urban catchment in Iran. Ten major rainfall events were monitored for total solids (TS), total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), Zn, and Pb. Total suspended solids and COD were usually above the permitted discharge. Power and polynomial functions fit well to the normalized curve of the distribution of pollutant load with volume. Discharge loads of TN, Pb, and Zn were approximately uniform. There was a relatively weak FF for TS, TSS, and COD. No correlation between FF load of TS and COD and rainfall–runoff characteristics was observed, but the amount of the FF load of TSS increases when the intensity and duration of a rainfall event increase. Key words: first flush, urban runoff quality, pollution load distribution, event mean concentration, urban stormwater runoff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207