MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161331137 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2008.080260

Decoding with Early Termination for Raptor Codes

2008· article· en· W2161331137 on OpenAlexaff
Ali AbdulHussein, Anand Oka, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsRaptor codeList decodingComputer scienceSequential decodingFountain codeAlgorithmBerlekamp–Welch algorithmOnline codesTheoretical computer scienceConcatenated error correction codeBlock code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rateless codes, and especially Raptor codes, have received considerable attention in the recent past due to their inherent ability to adapt to channel conditions and their capacity- approaching performance. Since decoding of rateless codes typically involves multiple decoding attempts, early termination of such attempts is mandatory for overall efficient decoding. In this letter, we propose a new decoding scheme with early termination that is particularly suited for rateless codes. Simulation results for the example of the binary symmetric channel show complexity reductions (in terms of the total required number of decoding iterations) by 87% compared to conventional message-passing decoding and 54% compared to a recently proposed incremental decoding scheme for Raptor codes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207