MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161345848 · doi:10.1080/09639480701461067

Le bruit et l'odeur… du succès? Contestation et contradictions dans le rock métis de Zebda

2007· article· fr· W2161345848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barbara Lebrun

Bibliographic record

VenueModern & Contemporary France · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le groupe de rock métis Zebda a fréquemment reçu les louanges de la presse de gauche en tant que groupe ‘engagé’ ou ‘contestataire’. Le fait qu'il soit mené par trois chanteurs d'origine algérienne pourrait laisser supposer que la rébellion est l'expression nécessaire de ces artistes français issus de l'immigration. Or, au travers d'une analyse sociologique du parcours et de la réception de Zebda, cet article démontre qu'aucune équation automatique n'existe entre identité ‘minoritaire’ et l'expression de la contestation. En observant le parcours individuel des chanteurs, leurs choix artistiques et leur gestion du succès à partir de 1999, cet article éclaire les origines contre-culturelles mais aussi les aspirations petit-bourgeoises du groupe. La trajectoire apparemment ‘subversive’ de Zebda, située au sein du discours sur la recherche ‘d'authenticité’ dans la chanson, peut alors se lire comme une ascension sociale, une success story qui rapproche ces beurs de l'intelligentsia gauchiste dominante. Imbriqué dans cette réflexion, l'article pose la question de l'évolution d'une culture ‘de jeunes’ lorsqu'elle est produite et consommée par des adultes à la réflexion intellectuelle élaborée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.031
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern & Contemporary FranceSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207