DIALLEL CROSSBREEDING EXPERIMENT IN DANISH AND HUNGARIAN MEAT RABBITS 1. REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, GROWTH, AND FEED CONVERSION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The two rabbit meat breeds, Danish White (D), represented by a 3-way cross of 3 lines from the Danish lnstitute of Animal Science (DIAS), and Pannon White (H), represented by a synthetic breed from the Pannon Agricultural University (PAU) were used in a diallel crossing experiment carried out simultaneously at the two locations. In the four combinations: DD, DH, HD, and HH the male breed is mentioned first. The length of gestation and the number of young at birth were the same for the does from the two breeds, but the number of days between kindlings was smaller in H-does than in Ddoes. Litter number five was the largest at birth. From weaning to the test end, the mortality for all 1,147 weaned young rabbits was only 2.7%. The largest number was seen in group (DD) with 5.4% and the smallest in group (HD) with 1.2%.The growth rate was recorded from weaning to an age of 70 days. Highest daily gain from weaning to an age of 70 days averaged 46.1 g in group (HD). A slightly smaller growth rate, 44.2 g, was obtained in group (DD). In group (DH), the growth rate averaged 43.9 g, and in group (HH) 41.2 g. Both crossbred groups grew faster than group (HH), but only group (HD) showed a crossbred effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it