MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161465044 · doi:10.1109/vetec.1998.686206

Influence of phase error on M-QAM demodulation in a non-Gaussian environment

2002· article· en· W2161465044 on OpenAlexaff
H.T. Huynh, Paul Fortier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemodulationQuadrature amplitude modulationQAMGaussianGaussian processRayleigh distributionAmplitudePoisson distributionPhase (matter)MathematicsLimit (mathematics)Additive white Gaussian noiseComputer scienceStatisticsStatistical physicsAlgorithmElectronic engineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsBit error rateProbability density functionOpticsMathematical analysisWhite noiseQuantum mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the influence of a deterministic phase error for coherent M-QAM demodulators in a non-Gaussian environment; the latter is modeled as a combination of a white Gaussian process and a filtered Poisson process whose enveloped amplitude obeys the Rayleigh distribution. General results show that when approaching the critical limit, the symbol error rate quickly reaches a plateau having a relatively large width.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207