MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161474553 · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32246-0

Guidelines for the Number of Embryos toTransfer Following In Vitro Fertilization

2006· article· en· W2161474553 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jason Min, Paul Claman, Ed Hughes, Anthony P. Cheung, Margo R. Fluker, Gwendolyn J. Goodrow, James Graham, Gillian Graves, Louise Lapensée, Sabrina Stewart, Susan Ward, Benjamin Wong, Anthony Armson, Marie‐France Delisle, Dan Farine, Robert Gagnon, Lisa Keenan-Lindsay, Valérie Morin, William Mundle, Tracey Pressey, Carol Schneider, John Van Aerde

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)Ontario Neurotrauma FoundationAlberta Bible CollegePrince Albert Grand CouncilCongress of Aboriginal Peoples
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIn vitro fertilisationLive birthPregnancyEmbryo transferInfertilityObstetricsGestationGynecologyReproductive medicineGuidelinePregnancy rateFertilityAndrologyPopulationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0090.002
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207