MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161485399 · doi:10.1242/jcs.114.16.2929

Intracellular pH homeostasis during cell-cycle progression and growth state transition in<i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i>

2001· article· en· W2161485399 on OpenAlexaff
Jim Karagiannis, Paul G. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntracellularBiologySchizosaccharomyces pombeHomeostasisCell cycleIntracellular pHCell biologySchizosaccharomycesCellBiochemistryBiophysicsYeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate measurement of intracellular pH in unperturbed cells is fraught with difficulty. Nevertheless, using a variety of methods, intracellular pH oscillations have been reported to play a regulatory role in the control of the cell cycle in several eukaryotic systems. Here, we examine pH homeostasis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a non-perturbing ratiometric pH sensitive GFP reporter. This method allows for accurate intracellular pH measurements in living, entirely undisturbed, logarithmically growing cells. In addition, the use of a flow cell allows internal pH to be monitored in real time during nutritional, or growth state transition. We can find no evidence for cell-cycle-related changes in intracellular pH. By contrast, all data are consistent with a very tight homeostatic regulation of intracellular pH near 7.3 at all points in the cell cycle. Interestingly, pH set point changes are associated with growth state. Spores, as well as vegetative cells starved of either nitrogen, or a carbon source, show a marked reduction in their internal pH compared with logarithmically growing vegetative cells. However, in both cases, homeostatic regulation is maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207