MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161562722 · doi:10.1109/tap.2006.889945

Geometric Design of Pyramidal Antenna Arrays for Hemispherical Scan Coverage

2007· article· en· W2161562722 on OpenAlexaff
I. Khalifa, Rodney G. Vaughan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthAntenna (radio)DirectivityElevation (ballistics)Pyramid (geometry)Elevation angleNear and far fieldRadiation patternFace (sociological concept)OpticsGeometryComputer sciencePhysicsAcousticsMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach is presented for optimizing the geometry of pyramidal antenna arrays, given a full azimuth and a full or limited elevation scan requirement. It involves choosing the best face elevation and number of faces of the pyramid, which minimize the maximum scan angle while maximizing the geometric directivity. The analysis shows that the 4-face pyramid is the best choice. The derivation assumes that the distance to the antenna is infinite (the true far-field case). However, when finite distances are considered, the maximum scan angle increases only slightly at the minimum far-field distance used for low sidelobe pattern measurement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207