MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reconstruir con capacidad de resiliencia: El casco histórico de la ciudad de Constitución y el sitio del desastre del terremoto y tsunami del 27 de febrero 2010

2015· article· es· W2161572496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yasna del Carmen Contreras Gatica, Maricel Beltran Benitez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista INVI · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de Chile
KeywordsRelocationQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyPolitical scienceResource (disambiguation)Welfare economicsArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

más dañadas durante el terremoto y tsunami del 27 de febrero del 2010.Parte de las viviendas del casco histórico quedaron dañadas y destruidas, y el tejido social quedó fracturado, tras la relocalización, especialmente de los habitantes del sector La Poza.A cuatro años del desastre, los cambios son lentos y las temporalidades de la reconstrucción son cuestionables.La reconstrucción en el casco histórico, resulta principalmente de iniciativas particulares de los residentes, de la reconversión comercial y de menores intervenciones de parte del Gobierno Central, especialmente,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista INVISame topicLatin American Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207