Control of three phase grid-connected photovoltaic arrays with open loop maximum power point tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a control technique for medium and large scale PV arrays connected to the power system grid. The array is interfaced to the grid through power electronic converters to change output voltages and currents from DC to AC quantities. A DC-DC boost converter is used to step up the output voltage of the array and extract maximum power under a given temperature and solar irradiation. A voltage source inverter under current control mode is connected to the DC converter through a DC link capacitor used to store power and act as a fixed DC bus for the inverter. A controller is used to regulate the capacitor voltage and keep it constant by balancing its input and output powers. The inverter is controlled in the rotating (dq) frame to inject AC power into the grid. An open loop maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique is proposed to quickly locate the maximum power point (MPP) of the PV array under varying weather conditions. This technique is simple to implement and does not require periodic measurements of the array output power as in most closed loop MPPT techniques. MATLAB software was used to simulate the system to confirm the performance and effectiveness of the proposed technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".