MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161587486

THE INAUGURAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY

2003· article· en· W2161587486 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Justice Randall W. Lalande

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManagementOfficerChief executive officerService (business)Executive directorPublic administrationPolitical scienceDirector generalCommunity serviceLawLibrary scienceSociologyPublic relationsBusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

City Officials M. Mieto, Chief Administrative Officer; C. Matheson, General Manager of Community Development; D. Nadorozny, General Manager of Growth & Development; A. Stephen, General Manager of Infrastructure & Emergency Services; C. Hallsworth, Executive Director of Administrative Services; L. Hayes, CFO/Treasurer; R. Swiddle, City Solicitor; G. Lamothe, Manager of Communications & French Language Service; P. Thomson, Director of Human Resources & Organizational Development; E. Labelle, Clerk Designate; K. O’Leary, Receptionist/Secretary; C. Riutta, Administrative Assistant to the Mayor; J. Nelson, Clerk’s Services Coordinator; M. Depatie, Administrative Assistant to Councillors; S. Carpenter, Co-ordinator of Compensation; J. McKechnie, Executive Assistant to the Mayor; A. Hache, City Clerk; F. Bortolussi, Planning Committee Secretary; CJ Caporale, Council Secretary;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1160.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLocal Governance and PlanningFrench-language works237,207