MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161606146 · doi:10.3233/brs-150087

Development and study of deck joints in prefabricated concrete bulb-tee bridge girders: Conceptual design

2015· article· en· W2161606146 on OpenAlex
Khaled Sennah, Hamdy M. Afefy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBridge Structures · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteGirderFlangeDeckStructural engineeringEngineeringBridge (graph theory)Prestressed concrete

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Speed of construction, particularly for bridge replacement and repair projects, has become a critical issue to minimize disruption of traffic and commerce. A promising system for rapid construction is a precast bridge system using decked bulb tee prestressed concrete girders. This type of bridge includes manufacturing the bridge deck precast and pretensioned with the girder in the precast plant under controlled environment. Then, the precast girders are transported to the construction site, and placed over the abutments and piers beside each other with flanges of adjacent girders field connected. Load transfer between adjacent girders is provided by longitudinal joints parallel to traffic direction. This paper presents a new bridge deck slab flange-to-flange connection system for precast Deck Bulb Tee (DBT) girders. The objectives of this study were to develop moment-transferred and intermittent-bolted connections for DBT bridge girders in view of the ultimate strength of the connection system. Two types of moment-transferring connection and two types of intermittent-bolted connection were developed. The paper presents design procedure of the developed joints based on available design equations in North American design codes for bridges and structures as well as related design equations available in the literature. The developed joint was considered successful if the theoretical resistance satisfied the requirements specified in North American Bridge Codes. Comparison between the theoretical findings and the available experimental failure loaded of actual-size bridge deck specimens simulating the developed connection justified the proposed theoretical design procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it