Transfection of lung cells in vitro and in vivo: effect of antioxidants and intraliposomal bFGF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We hypothesized that constitutive formation of reactive oxygen species by respiratory cells is a barrier to gene transfer when liposome-DNA complexes are used, by contributing to rapid degradation of plasmid DNA. When plasmid DNA is complexed to liposomes it is protected against H(2)O(2)-mediated degradation but not that mediated by the hydroxyl radical. Treatment of distal rat fetal lung epithelial cells (RFL(19)Ep) with the vitamin E analog Trolox (50 microM) reduced intracellular plasmid degradation. Both Trolox (50 microM) and an iron chelator, phenanthroline (0.1 microM), significantly increased transgene expression in RFL(19)Ep approximately twofold, consistent with a hydroxyl radical-mediated inhibition of transgene expression. When basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; 20 ng/ml), a growth factor with antioxidant properties, was included within liposomes, we observed a significantly greater enhancement of RFL(19)Ep transgene expression (approximately 2-fold) over that seen with Trolox or phenanthroline. Inclusion of bFGF within liposomes also significantly enhanced (approximately 4-fold) transgene expression in mice following intratracheal instillation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".