MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161628842 · doi:10.1007/s00424-009-0639-1

Consequences of perinatal treatment with l-arginine and antioxidants for the renal transcriptome in spontaneously hypertensive rats

2009· article· en· W2161628842 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastiaan Wesseling, Maarten P. Koeners, Farid Kantouh, Jaap A. Joles, Branko Braam

Bibliographic record

VenuePflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersNierstichtingEuropean Commission
KeywordsEndocrinologyGene expressionTranscriptomeInternal medicineGeneBlood pressureArginineTranscription factorTranscription (linguistics)Spontaneously hypertensive ratKidneyBiologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treating spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with L-arginine, taurine, and vitamins C and E (ATCE) during nephrogenesis (2 weeks before to 4 weeks after birth) persistently lowers blood pressure. Hypothetically, differential gene expression in kidney of SHR vs. normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) is partially corrected by maternal ATCE in SHR. Differential gene expression in 2-days, 2-weeks, and 48-week-old rats was studied using oligonucleotide chips. Transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) of differentially expressed genes were analyzed in silico. Differential gene expression varied between SHR+ATCE and SHR, suggesting both direct and indirect effects; but, few genes were modulated toward WKY level and there was little overlap between ages. TFBS analysis suggests less Elk-1-driven gene transcription in both WKY and SHR+ATCE vs. SHR at 2 days and 2 weeks. Concluding, in SHR, persistent antihypertensive effects of maternal ATCE are not primarily due to persistent corrective transcription. Less Elk-1-driven transcription at 2 days and 2 weeks may be involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePflügers Archiv - European Journal of PhysiologySame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207