MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161656712 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386201

A New Stabilizer and Design Algorithm to Minimize the Excitation of Undesirable Oscillations

2007· article· en· W2161656712 on OpenAlexaff
N. Kshatriya, U.D. Annakkage, A.M. Gole

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStabilizer (aeronautics)Control theory (sociology)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsOscillation (cell signaling)Low-frequency oscillationElectric power systemController (irrigation)Power (physics)Compensation (psychology)State spaceExcitationPhase compensationMode (computer interface)Computer scienceMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new state-space type stabilizer and its design algorithm to minimize low frequency oscillation is proposed. The proposed power system stabilizer (PSS) design algorithm not only damps the oscillations by moving the eigenvalues to desired left hand plane locations but additionally reduces the excitation of the mode itself through optimization of the left eigenvector of the poorly damped electro-mechanical mode. The stabilizer is implemented as a state-space (SS) type controller which is optimized using a constrained optimization procedure. Two possible inputs, speed and electrical power are considered as candidate inputs to the stabilizers. The state-space design is also compared with one based on traditional lead-lag compensation. The SS type stabilizer with electrical power input is shown to perform better compared to any other type of PSS by minimizing low frequency oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207