MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161664698 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20116

Unique insertional translocation in a childhood Wilms' tumor survivor detected when his daughter developed bilateral retinoblastoma

2003· article· en· W2161664698 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Punnett, Ikuko Teshima, Élise Héon, Andrew Budning, Joanne Sutherland, Brenda L. Gallie, Helen S. L. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinoblastomaChromosomal translocationWilms' tumorInsertional mutagenesisBiologyOffspringCancer researchGeneticsGenePregnancyMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinoblastoma and Wilms' tumor are rare childhood embryonic tumors associated with loss or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, RB1 located within 13q14, and WT1 located within 11p13. Interchromosomal insertional translocations occur rarely, and such rearrangements within RB1 or WT1, even rarer. We report a unique family in which an insertional translocation of a chromosomal segment that included band 13q14 inserted into 11p13 caused childhood Wilms' tumor in the father, and whose child developed bilateral retinoblastoma. This is the first case of an insertional translocation that caused both tumors. This insertional translocation had significant consequences for genetic counseling and in utero diagnosis. The estimated risk for an offspring of this father to develop Wilms' tumor is up to 50%, to develop retinoblastoma up to 25%, to have neither tumor 25%, and to have both tumors 0%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207