MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161689558 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2007.989

Packet-Level Channel Model for Wireless OFDM Systems

2007· article· en· W2161689558 on OpenAlexaff
Ruonan Zhang, Lin Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingSubcarrierFadingComputer scienceChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Frequency domainBit error rateElectronic engineeringNetwork packetWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a novel packet-level channel model for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems over frequency-selective Nakagami-m fading channel. Since the subcarriers are correlated, the Level Cross Rate (LCR) in frequency response is introduced and derived. A complete model including finite state Markov chains in both the time domain and the frequency domain is proposed for the multi- carrier system, which models the received signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each subcarrier and further presents the packet error behavior of the OFDM system. This model is useful for upper layer protocol design and analysis over OFDM systems, and it speeds up significantly the simulation for OFDM networks over fading channels. The model is validated by simulations, which confirm that the statistical properties of the frequency-selective fading channel have been maintained in our model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207