MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161689558 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2007.989

Packet-Level Channel Model for Wireless OFDM Systems

2007· article· en· W2161689558 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingSubcarrierFadingComputer scienceChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Frequency domainBit error rateElectronic engineeringNetwork packetWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a novel packet-level channel model for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems over frequency-selective Nakagami-m fading channel. Since the subcarriers are correlated, the Level Cross Rate (LCR) in frequency response is introduced and derived. A complete model including finite state Markov chains in both the time domain and the frequency domain is proposed for the multi- carrier system, which models the received signal to noise ratio (SNR) of each subcarrier and further presents the packet error behavior of the OFDM system. This model is useful for upper layer protocol design and analysis over OFDM systems, and it speeds up significantly the simulation for OFDM networks over fading channels. The model is validated by simulations, which confirm that the statistical properties of the frequency-selective fading channel have been maintained in our model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207