Application Of Airborne C-SAR And Spot Image For Geological Investigation Of The Nahanni Earthquake Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS), SPOT satellite, and airborne C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are processed, integrated, and interpreted for regional tectonic feature interpretation including the study of surface geological and topographical features. The final composite image clearly shows the 1985 landslides caused by the two large earthquakes hear the North Nahanni River, NWT, Canada. The final C-SAR/SPOT image overlaid with main shock and aftershock epicenter information appears to reveal a new N-S trending tectonic feature which meets the Iverson thrust fault at the southernmost portion of Boom Creek. This coincides with the southern end of the main shock and aftershock epicenter cluster in the area. There is apparently an E-W trending structure which follows along the North Nahanni River west of the Iverson Range. This feature extends towards the east outside of the C-SAR/SPOT composite image and appears to continue in an east-southeasternly direction towards the MacKenzie River.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".