MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161701941 · doi:10.1002/path.2744

The biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas

2010· article· en· W2161701941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pathology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalBC Cancer AgencyCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerous fluidImmunohistochemistryTissue microarrayClear cellPopulationSerous carcinomaPathologyCarcinomaP53 expressionStage (stratigraphy)Proportional hazards modelMedicineOncologyBiologyCancerOvarian cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it