MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161725827 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780514

Optimization of beech wood pulping in catalyzed acetic acid media

2000· article· en· W2161725827 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carlos Vila, Valentín Santos, Juan Carlos Parajó

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeechPulp and paper industryAcetic acidCatalysisChemistryLigninOrganic chemistryBotanyEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fagus sylvatica wood samples were treated in HCl‐catalyzed, acetic acid solutions. The effects of selected operational variables (catalyst concentration, reaction time and liquor to wood ratio) on pulp yield, composition of pulps and composition of pulping liquors were assessed using incomplete, second‐order, centred, factorial designs. Pulp composition was measured by the contents in cellulose, xylan and lignin. The concentrations of glucose, xylose and furfural in pulping liquors were also considered as experimental variables. Under selected conditions, pulps with 5.8% to 7.5% Klason lignin (kappa numbers in the range 25 to 33), 77.2% to 85.3% cellulose and 3.3% to 6.1% xylan were obtained at 45.8% to 50.0% pulp yield. The selected pulps showed good SCAN viscosity (723 to 814 mL/g) and alkaline resistances which were affected by the acetyl group content of samples (6.6 to 7.6 weight percent).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207