MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161734848 · doi:10.1142/s2010326312500025

THE ABSOLUTE POSITIVE PARTIAL TRANSPOSE PROPERTY FOR RANDOM INDUCED STATES

2012· article· en· W2161734848 on OpenAlexaff
Benoı̂t Collins, Ion Nechita, Deping Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueRandom Matrices Theory and Application · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsTransposeDimension (graph theory)Wishart distributionCombinatoricsRandom matrixLimit (mathematics)Algebraic numberState (computer science)Mathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsStatisticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first obtain an algebraic formula for the moments of a centered Wishart matrix, and apply it to obtain new convergence results in the large dimension limit when both parameters of the distribution tend to infinity at different speeds. We use this result to investigate APPT (absolute positive partial transpose) quantum states. We show that the threshold for a bipartite random induced state on Cd = Cd1 ⊗ Cd2, obtained by partial tracing a random pure state on Cd ⊗ Cs, being APPT occurs if the environmental dimension s is of order s0 = min (d1, d2)3 max (d1, d2). That is, when s ≥ Cs0, such a random induced state is APPT with large probability, while such a random states is not APPT with large probability when s ≤ cs0. Besides, we compute effectively C and c and show that it is possible to replace them by the same sharp transition constant when min (d1, d2)2 ≪ d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRandom Matrices Theory and ApplicationSame topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207