Role of The <scp> CO <sub>2</sub> </scp> System in Regulating Intramuscular Hydrogen Ion Concentration during Exercise in Horses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Elimination of CO 2 from skeletal muscle ( mCO 2 ) during exercise is important for the regulation of intramuscular [ H + ] ([m H + ]). Carbonic anhydrase ( CA ) catalyses the hydration/dehydration reaction of CO 2 to facilitate its elimination. We hypothesised that extracellular CA inhibition and subsequent increase in PCO 2 will result in increased m[ H + ] and decreased exercise performance. Methods Six horses were exercised on a treadmill until fatigue without (Con) and with acetazolamide ( CA inhibitor) treatment (Acz; 30 mg/kg, 30 min before exercise). Arterial and mixed‐venous blood was sampled, and biopsies collected from gluteal muscles at fatigue. Whole blood (wb) arteriovenous difference across the muscle (a‐v) of [ N a + ], [ K + ], [ C l − ], [ Lac − ], [ SID ], and PCO 2 , mCO 2 and m[ H + ] were determined. Paired t‐test was used to assess statistical significance (P<0.05). Results Duration of exercise to fatigue was not affected by Acz. Compared to Con, Acz increased mCO 2 (Con 16.5(mean) ± 3.6( SE ), Acz 20.5 ± 2 mmol/L) and mixed‐venous and arterial PCO 2 but had no effect on VCO 2 . No difference was observed in m[ H + ] between Con (118 ± 18 nmol/L) and Acz (99 ± 16 nmol/L). Acetazolamide did not affect plasma [ H + ]. Based on the a‐v differences Acz increased [ N a + ]wb and [ K + ]wb release, increased [ C l ‐ ]wb uptake and did not affect [Lac ‐ ]wb release by the muscle. Acz decreased a‐v[ SID ]wb (Con 6.2 ± 2.8 mmol/L, Acz −0.3 ± 2 mmol/L). Conclusions Although PCO 2 and mCO 2 were elevated no difference in [m H + ] was observed. An increase in m[ H + ] due to elevated mCO 2 was attenuated by strong ion fluxes between intramuscular and vascular spaces. Strong ion exchanges are important in attenuating m[ H + ] and maintaining exercise performance. Ethical Animal Research The study protocols were approved by the A nimal Care C ommittee of the U niversity of G uelph according to the Guide to the Care and U se of Experimental Animals ( C anadian C ouncil on A nimal Care, O ttawa, O ntario). Sources of funding: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food ‐ Equine Program, Department of C linical Studies at the U niversity of G uelph, Canadian Institutes of H ealth R esearch and the S</jats:styled-con
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".