MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161764074 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334878

Nonlinear adaptive control of a new configuration of rotary wing unmanned aerial vehicle

2012· article· en· W2161764074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Parametric statisticsNonlinear systemEuler anglesPosition (finance)Feedback linearizationRotor (electric)LinearizationVehicle dynamicsAttitude controlOrientation (vector space)Stability derivativesStability (learning theory)EngineeringAdaptive controlComputer scienceControl engineeringAerodynamicsAerospace engineeringControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) under investigation (Evader) has two rotors with the capability of independent lateral and longitudinal rotor tilting. The dynamic model of this vehicle is derived based on the Newton-Euler equations. The parametric uncertainties are considered in the model and an adaptive control law based on feedback linearization is proposed to overcome model uncertainties. The stability of the UAV's position and orientation are proved based on Lyaounov stability analysis. It is shown that the vehicle's errors in position, pitch, roll and yaw angles are all ultimately driven to zero under parametric uncertainties. Performance of the control strategy is investigated via extensive simulation tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207