MC-SkyNet: Mobile-cloud dynamic partitioning for mobile cloud applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile devices have limited resources including short battery life, storage capacity and processor performance. This limits the applications that can run on it. Mobile applications can be partitioned so that some of the application runs on a cloud. This works well for applications with relatively little data to be transferred and that do not have a high level of interactiveness with the user. Challenges with applications that have large amounts of data to be transferred and have a high level interactiveness is the high latency incurred by the wired network and packet loss of the wireless network. A cloudlet is a resource-rich computer or cluster of computers that is connected to the Internet and is available for use by nearby mobile devices. A mobile application can be partitioned so that part of it runs on the cloudlet. In this paper, we present the MC-Skynet framework which introduces fine-grained offloading approach and support for runtime and dynamic partitioning of an application. This is different from previous approaches, in that MC-Skynet not only provides dynamic partitioning and offloading, but is also adaptive to the changes of the state of a cloudlet by introducing a cloudlet mesh network and self-learningg decision making module to estimate the offloading cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".