MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161796519 · doi:10.1586/14760584.5.2.175

An adolescent and adult formulation combined tetanus, diphtheria and five-component pertussis vaccine

2006· review· en· W2161796519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael E. Pichichero, Lisa DeTora, David R. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Vaccines · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactogenicityFilamentous haemagglutinin adhesinMedicinePertactinTetanusDiphtheriaContext (archaeology)VaccinationPediatricsImmunizationImmunologyPertussis vaccineBordetella pertussisPertussis toxinImmune systemInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pertussis causes substantial morbidity among adolescents and adults, as well as other persons in contact with affected individuals. In the context of widespread childhood immunization, vaccination of adolescents and adults is a relatively new strategy for reducing the disease in all age groups. ADACEL is a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis combination vaccine (incorporating pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and fimbriae type 2 and 3 antigens) formulated for use in adolescents and adults based on similar products designed for infants and children. ADACEL vaccine is approved for use in Australia, Canada, Germany and the USA, and has been demonstrated to induce robust immune responses and acceptable levels of reactogenicity in clinical trials. Surveillance data from Canada, where ADACEL vaccine has been used in adolescents and adults in conjunction with ongoing childhood vaccination for several years, indicate an enhanced overall reduction in pertussis disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of VaccinesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207