MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161814252 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v3n1p106

Theoretical Perspectives on Campus Cultism and Violence in Nigeria Universities: A Review and Conceptual Approach

2011· review· en· W2161814252 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amos Emiloju Arijesuyo, Oyewole Omoniyi Olusanya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultAggressionPsychologyPoliticsIntervention (counseling)PhenomenonCriminologySocial psychologySociologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most African universities including Nigeria have witnessed youth violent activities laced with campusconfraternities. The disturbing phenomenon has led to several theories on the emergence of this worrisome trendand what could be done to stave it off. This paper reviewed the major theoretical perspectives on the campuscult-violence and its attendant psychopathological behaviour among Nigerian youths. The review is selective andconfined to the theoretical and investigative perspectives which presumably best fit Nigerian models ofsocio-cultural background. In the light of the existing empirical research which bears upon these theoreticalconclusions; a conceptual framework – psycho-infrastructuralism was proposed as an intervention model. Theframework shows the linkages between campus cult-violence and key factors of psycho-personality bias,frustration-aggression hypothesis, ethno-political theory and the environmentalist perspectives. It is suggested that,as a complex dynamic process, campus cult-violence activities and its key covariates must be measured andanalyzed within psycho-infrastructural model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicBullying, Victimization, and AggressionFrench-language works237,207