Case Transfer: A Design Approach by Artifacts and Projection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
October 01 2010 Case Transfer: A Design Approach by Artifacts and Projection Rosan Chow, Rosan Chow Rosan Chow holds a BA in Art and Design and a MDes from the University of Alberta, Canada. She has also obtained her PhD in 'Designwissenschaft' from the University of Arts Braunschweig, Germany. Since 2007, she has been a senior research scientist at the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories in Berlin. Her research interests include design methodology, theory, and discourse. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Wolfgang Jonas Wolfgang Jonas Wolfgang Jonas studied naval architecture and earned his PhD on the computer-aided optimization of streamlined shapes. He worked as a consulting engineer for companies in the automobile industry and the German standardization institute. Since 1988, he has been teaching CAD and industrial design, and doing design research on system theory and design theory, 1994 lecturing qualification (Habilitation) in design theory. Since 1994, he has been a professor at several German design schools, currently for "system design" at the School of Art and Design, University of Kassel. His focus of interest is design theory as meta theory, design methods in a systemic perspective, and scenario planning. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Rosan Chow Rosan Chow holds a BA in Art and Design and a MDes from the University of Alberta, Canada. She has also obtained her PhD in 'Designwissenschaft' from the University of Arts Braunschweig, Germany. Since 2007, she has been a senior research scientist at the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories in Berlin. Her research interests include design methodology, theory, and discourse. Wolfgang Jonas Wolfgang Jonas studied naval architecture and earned his PhD on the computer-aided optimization of streamlined shapes. He worked as a consulting engineer for companies in the automobile industry and the German standardization institute. Since 1988, he has been teaching CAD and industrial design, and doing design research on system theory and design theory, 1994 lecturing qualification (Habilitation) in design theory. Since 1994, he has been a professor at several German design schools, currently for "system design" at the School of Art and Design, University of Kassel. His focus of interest is design theory as meta theory, design methods in a systemic perspective, and scenario planning. Online ISSN: 1531-4790 Print ISSN: 0747-9360 © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2010 Design Issues (2010) 26 (4): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00040 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Rosan Chow, Wolfgang Jonas; Case Transfer: A Design Approach by Artifacts and Projection. Design Issues 2010; 26 (4): 9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00040 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsDesign Issues Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2010 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".