MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161825171 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.1989.38965

A balanced 11 GHz HEMT up-converter

2003· article· en· W2161825171 on OpenAlexaff
P. Bura, B. Vassilakis

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digest · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermodulationdBcHigh-electron-mobility transistorAmplifierElectrical engineeringTransistorLinearityPhysicsDiodeOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineeringVoltagePhase noiseCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 70-MHz-11-GHz balanced up-converter circuit is described. HEMTs (high electron mobility transistors) were found to be very suitable for this application due to their high gain at 11 GHz. The measured results show 7-dBm, 1-dB gain compression point, 15-dBm third-order intercept point, 3-dB conversion gain, and 35-dB LO (local oscillator) suppression. In a linearized mode the up-converter exhibited IMR (intermodulation ratio) of better than -40 dBc up to 0 dBm single-tone output level. A diode up-converter IMR of -40 dBc typically has at -6 dBm output level (single tone). The HEMT up-converter operates with the same linearity at a 6-dB-higher level as the diode up-converter for the same LO drive. The higher linear output level is important for digital QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) radio applications, as the gain of the transmitter power amplifier can be correspondingly reduced.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium digestSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207