MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Immunobiology of Asthma

2009· review· en· W2161826873 on OpenAlexafffund
Qutayba Hamid, Meri K. Tulić

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Physiology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsImmunologyInflammationChemokineAsthmaMedicineProinflammatory cytokineImmunoglobulin EBronchoconstrictionAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation of the airways in which there is an overabundance of eosinophils, mast cells, and activated T helper lymphocytes. These inflammatory cells release mediators that then trigger bronchoconstriction, mucus secretion, and remodeling. The inflammatory mediators that drive this process include cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, lipid mediators, immunoglobulins, and histamine. The inflammation in allergic asthma can be difficult to control. This is mainly due to the development of an adaptive immunity to an allergen, leading to immunological memory. This leads to recall reactions to the allergen, causing persistent inflammation and damage to the airways. Generally, in asthma inflammation is directed by Th2 cytokines, which can act by positive feedback mechanisms to promote the production of more inflammatory mediators including other cytokines and chemokines. This review discusses the role of cytokines and chemokines in the immunobiology of asthma and attempts to relate their expression to morphological and functional abnormalities in the lungs of asthmatic subjects. We also discuss new concepts in asthma immunology, in particular the role of cytokines in airway remodeling and the interaction between cytokines and infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations369
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of PhysiologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207