Ultrasound Imaging and Its Application in Speech-Language Pathology and Speech Science
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial DisordersArticle1 Oct 2007Ultrasound Imaging and Its Application in Speech-Language Pathology and Speech Science Tim Bressmann Tim Bressmann Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of TorontoToronto, Canada Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/ssod17.2.7 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Adler-Bock, M., Bernhardt, B. M., Gick, B., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2007). The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /r/ in 2 adolescents.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 128–139. LinkGoogle Scholar Akgul, Y. S., Kambhamettu, C., & Stone, M. (1999). Automatic extraction and tracking of the tongue contours.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18, 1035–1045. Google Scholar Bacsfalvi, P., Bernhardt, B. M., & Gick, B. (2007). Electropalatography and ultrasound in vowel remediation for adolescents with hearing impairment.Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9, 36–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Bernhardt, B., Bacsfalvi, P., Gick, B., Radanov, B., & Williams, R. (2005). Exploring the use of electro-palatography and ultrasound in speech habilitation.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 29, 169–182. Google Scholar Bernhardt, B., Gick, B., Bacsfalvi, P., & Adler-Bock, M. (2005). Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 605–617. MedlineGoogle Scholar Bernhardt, B., Gick, B., Bacsfalvi, P., & Ashdown, J. (2003). Speech habilitation of hard of hearing adolescents using electropalatography and ultrasound as evaluated by trained listeners.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27, 199–216. Google Scholar Boehme, G. (1992). Duplexsonographie des Kehlkopfes: Farbkodierte Bewegungsanalyse intralaryngealer Strukturen.Otorhinolaryngologia Nova, 2, 43–45. Google Scholar Bosma, J. F., Hepburn, L. G., Josell, S. D., & Baker, K. (1990). Ultrasound demonstration of tongue motions during suckle feeding.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32, 223–229. Google Scholar Bressmann, T., Ackloo, E., Heng, C.-L., & Irish, J. C. (2007). Quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of partially resected tongues.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 136, 799–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Bressmann, T., Heng, C.-L., & Irish, J. C. (2005). Applications of 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging in speech-language pathology.Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 29, 158–168. Google Scholar Bressmann, T., Thind, P., Uy, C., Bollig, C., Gilbert, R. W., & Irish, J. C. (2005). Quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound analysis of tongue protrusion, grooving and symmetry: Data from 12 normal speakers and a partial glossectomee.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 573–588. Google Scholar Bressmann, T., Uy, C., & Irish, J. C. (2005). Analysing normal and partial glossectomee tongues using ultrasound.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 35–52. Google Scholar Casas, M. J., Kenny, D. J., & Macmillan, R. E. (2003). Buccal and lingual activity during mastication and swallowing in typical adults.Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30, 9–16. Google Scholar Casas, M. J., Kenny, D. J., & McPherson, K. A. (1994). Swallowing/ventilation interactions during oral swallow in normal children and children with cerebral palsy.Dysphagia, 9, 40–46. Google Scholar Casas, M. J., McPherson, K. A., & Kenny, D. J. (1995). Durational aspects of oral swallow in neurologically normal children and children with cerebral palsy: An ultrasound investigation.Dysphagia, 10, 155–159. Google Scholar Cheng, C. F., Peng, C. L., Chiou, H. Y., & Tsai, C. Y. (2002). Dentofacial morphology and tongue function during swallowing.American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 122, 491–499. Google Scholar Chi-Fishman, G. (2005). Quantitative lingual, pharyngeal and laryngeal ultrasonography in swallowing research: A technical review.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 589–604. Google Scholar Chi-Fishman, G., Stone, M., & McCall, G. N. (1998). Lingual action in normal sequential swallowing.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 771–785. LinkGoogle Scholar Davidson, L. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 407–415. Google Scholar Garel, C., Contencin, P., Polonovski, J. M., Hassan, M., & Narcy, P. (1992). Laryngeal ultrasonography in infants and children: A new way of investigating. Normal and pathological findings.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 23, 107–115. Google Scholar Gick, B., & Rahemtulla, S. (2004, April). Recent developments in quantitative analysis of ultrasound tongue data. Paper presented at the meeting of the Second Ultrasound Roundtable, Vancouver, BC. Google Scholar Gu, J., Bressmann, T., Cannons, K., & Wong, W. (2004). The Ultrasonographic Contour Analyzer for Tongue Surfaces (Ultra-CATS). Toronto: University of Toronto. Google Scholar Harries, M., Hawkins, S., Hacking, J., & Hughes, I. (1998). Changes in the male voice at puberty: Vocal fold length and its relationship to the fundamental frequency of the voice.Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 112, 451–454. Google Scholar Hiiemae, K. M., & Palmer, J. B. (2003). Tongue movements in feeding and speech.Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, 14, 413–429. Google Scholar Kelsey, C. A., Woodhouse, R. J., & Minifie, F. D. (1969). Ultrasonic observations of coarticulation in the pharynx.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 1016–1018. Google Scholar Kenny, D. J., Casa, M. J., & McPherson, K. A. (1989). Correlation of ultrasound imaging of oral swallow with ventilatory alterations in cerebral palsied and normal children: Preliminary observations.Dysphagia, 4, 112–117. Google Scholar Kikyo, T., Saito, M., & Ishikawa, M. (1999). A study comparing ultrasound images of tongue movements between open bite children and normal children in the early mixed dentition period.Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, 46, 127–137. Google Scholar Lundberg, A., & Stone, M. (1999). Three-dimensional tongue surface reconstruction: Practical considerations for ultrasound data.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2858–2867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Miller, J. L., & Watkin, K. L. (1997). Lateral pharyngeal wall motion during swallowing using real time ultrasound.Dysphagia, 12, 125–132. Google Scholar Morrish, K. A., Stone, M., Sonies, B. C., Kurtz, D., & Shawker, T. (1984). Characterization of tongue shape.Ultrasonic Imaging, 6, 37–47. Google Scholar Munhall, K. G. (1985). An examination of intra-articulator relative timing.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 1548–1553. Google Scholar Neuschäfer-Rube, C., Wein, B. B., Angerstein, W., Klajman, S., & Fischer-Wein, G. (1997). Sektorbezogene Grauwertanalyse videosonographisch aufgezeichneter Zungenbewegungen beim Schlucken.HNO, 45, 556–562. Google Scholar Parush, A., & Ostry, D. J. (1993). Lower pharyngeal wall coarticulation in VCV syllables.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 715–722. Google Scholar Peng, C. L., Jost-Brinkmann, P. G., Miethke, R. R., & Lin, C. T. (2000). Ultrasonographic measurement of tongue movement during swallowing.Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 19, 15–20. Google Scholar Schliephake, H., Schmelzeisen, R., Schönweiler, R., Schneller, T., & Altenbernd, C. (1998). Speech, deglutition and life quality after intraoral tumour resection. A prospective study.International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 27, 99–105. Google Scholar Shawker, T. H., & Sonies, B. C. (1984). Tongue movement during speech: A real-time ultrasound evaluation.Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 12, 125–133. MedlineGoogle Scholar Shawker, T. H., & Sonies, B. C. (1985). Ultrasound biofeedback for speech training. Instrumentation and preliminary results.Investigative Radiology, 20, 90–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Shawker, T. H., Sonies, B., Stone, M., & Baum, B. J. (1983). Real-time ultrasound visualization of tongue movement during swallowing.Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 11, 485–490. Google Scholar Skolnick, M. L., Zagzebski, J. A., & Watkin, K. L. (1975). Two-dimensional ultrasonic demonstration of lateral pharyngeal wall movement in real time: A preliminary report.Cleft Palate Journal, 12, 299–303. Google Scholar Soder, N., & Miller, N. (2002). Using ultrasound to investigate intrapersonal variability in durational aspects of tongue movement during swallowing.Dysphagia, 17, 288–297. Google Scholar Sonies, B. C., Baum, B. J., & Shawker, T. H. (1984). Tongue motion in elderly adults: Initial in situ observations.Journal of Gerontology, 39, 279–283. Google Scholar Sonies, B. C., & Dalakas, M. C. (1991). Dysphagia in patients with the post-polio syndrome.New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 1162–1167. Google Scholar Stone, M. (1990). A three-dimensional model of tongue movement based on ultrasound and X-ray microbeam data.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2207–2217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Stone, M. (2005). A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images.Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 455–501. Google Scholar Stone, M., & Davis, E. P. (1995). A head and transducer support system for making ultrasound images of tongue/jaw movement.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 3107–3112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Stone, M., & Lundberg, A. (1996). Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3728–3737. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Stone, M., Morrish, K., Sonies, B. C., & Shawker, T. H. (1987). Tongue curvature: A model of shape during vowel production.Folia Phoniatrica, 39, 302–315. Google Scholar Stone, M., & Shawker, T. H. (1986). An ultrasound examination of tongue movement during swallowing.Dysphagia, 1, 78–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Stone, M., Shawker, T. H., Talbot, T. L., & Rich, A. H. (1988). Cross-sectional tongue shape during the production of vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1586–1596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ueda, D., Yano, K., & Okuno, A. (1993). Ultrasonic imaging of the tongue, mouth, and vocal cords in normal children: Establishment of basic scanning positions.Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 21, 431–439. Google Scholar Unser, M., & Stone, M. (1992). Automated detection of the tongue surface in sequences of ultrasound images.Journal of the Acoustal Society of Canada, 91, 3001–3007. Google Scholar Watkin, K. L., & Rubin, J. M. (1989). Pseudo-three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasonic images of the tongue.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 496–499. Google Scholar Wein, B., Alzen, G., Tolxdorff, T., Bockler, R., Klajman, S., & Huber, W. (1988). Computersonograph-ische Darstellung der Zungen-motilität mittels Pseudo-3D-Rekonstruktion.Ultraschall in der Medizin, 9, 95–97. Google Scholar Wein, B., Bockler, R., Huber, W., Klajman, S., & Willmes, K. (1990). Computersonographische Darstellung von Zungenformen bei der Bildung der langen Vokale des Deutschen.Ultraschall in der Medizin, 11, 100–103. Google Scholar Wein, B., Klajman, S., Huber, W., & Doring, W. H. (1988). Ultraschall-untersuchung von Koordination-sstörungen der Zungenbewegung beim Schlucken.Nervenarzt, 59, 154–158. Google Scholar Wrench, A. (2004, April). QMUC Matching, merging and means: Spline productivity tools for ultrasound analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Second Ultrasound Roundtable, Vancouver, BC. Google Scholar Yang, C. S., & Stone, M. (2002). Dynamic programming method for temporal registration of three-dimensional tongue surface motion from multiple utterances.Speech Communication, 38, 199–207. Google Scholar Zagzebski, J. A. (1975). Ultrasonic measurement of lateral pharyngeal wall motion at two levels in the vocal tract.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 308–318. LinkGoogle Scholar Zappia, F., & Campani, R. (2000). La laringe: Studio ecografico anatomico e funzionale.Radiologia Medica, 99, 138–144. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 17Issue 2October 2007Pages: 7-15 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2007 Metrics Downloaded 43 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".