MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161846901 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.1992.279866

Dynamic variable partitioning as a means of sharing mobile satellite spectrum

2003· article· en· W2161846901 on OpenAlexaff
J. W. Jones

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersMultiple System Atrophy Trust
KeywordsComputer scienceSatelliteVariable (mathematics)Service (business)Spectrum (functional analysis)Mobile computingMobile telephonyOrder (exchange)Broad spectrumTelecommunicationsMathematicsMobile radioEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers a method of dynamically sharing frequency spectrum between two mobile satellite services, taking advantage of fluctuations in demand for the two services in order to use spectrum more efficiently. The work in this paper was motivated by the need to share spectrum on a dynamic basis between the aeronautical mobile satellite (route) service (AMS(R)S) and other mobile satellite services, with AMS(R)S having absolute priority. Using North American statistics, the expected fluctuations in demand for the two services are examined, providing estimates of improved efficiency that can in general result from the use of dynamic variable partitioning (DVP). An algorithm developed as one possible implementation of DVP is described, followed by the results of computer simulation of this algorithm.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207