Thermodynamic properties of aqueous diethanolamine (DEA), <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethylethanolamine (DMEA), and their chloride salts: apparent molar heat capacities and volumes at temperatures from 283.15 to 328.15 K
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apparent molar heat capacities Cp,ϕ and apparent molar volumes Vϕ for aqueous diethanolamine (HOC2H4)2NH, diethanolammonium chloride (HOC2H4)2NH2Cl, N,N'-dimethylethanolamine (HOC2H4)(CH3)2N, and N,N'-dimethylethanolammonium chloride (HOC2H4)(CH3)2NHCl were determined from 283.15 to 328.15 K with a Picker flow microcalorimeter and vibrating tube densimeter. The experimental results have been analyzed in terms of Young's Rule with the Guggenheim form of the extended Debye-Hückel equation and appropriate corrections for chemical relaxation effects. These calculations lead to standard partial molar heat capacities and volumes for the neutral amines, (HOC2H4)2NH(aq) and (HOC2H4)(CH3)2N(aq), and the ions (HOC2H4)2NH2+(aq) and (HOC2H4)(CH3)2NH+(aq) over the experimental temperature range. Key words: standard partial molar volumes, standard partial molar heat capacities, diethanolamine, dimethyethanolamine, aqueous alkanolamine ionization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".