MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161873235 · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.080188

On physically-based normalization of MIMO channel matrices

2009· article· en· W2161873235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalization (sociology)MIMOComputer scienceChannel capacityTopology (electrical circuits)Channel (broadcasting)Antenna (radio)Electronic engineeringPerspective (graphical)TelecommunicationsMathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various normalizations of the MIMO channel matrix are discussed from a physical perspective. It is demonstrated that the physics of antenna arrays and propagation channel should be taken into account when normalization is chosen, so that SNR has proper physical meaning, the conclusions are physical and correspond to realistic systems. The antenna array geometry and the transmission strategy (coherent/non-coherent) limits the choice of normalization and determines how the capacity and other performance metrics scale with the number of antennas, which is more pronounced for densely-populated antenna arrays. This is especially important for an asymptotic analysis, when the number of antennas increases to infinity. Limitations of such analysis from the physical perspective are pointed out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it