MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161892975 · doi:10.7202/007573ar

Au-delà des mouvements sociaux : une typologie relationnelle des conflits urbains

2004· article· fr· W2161892975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche quantitative systématique sur l’activité conflictuelle est née dans les années 1960. L’étude des conflits urbains, qui peuvent revêtir la forme d’activités de protestation, est très souvent réalisée dans le cadre conceptuel des mouvements sociaux urbains. Cependant, il est maintenant établi que ces conflits ne sont pas tous le fait de mouvements sociaux et que le changement social ne procède pas que des mouvements sociaux. Comment, alors, analyser adéquatement les conflits urbains auxquels prennent part des acteurs et des actrices qui ne participent pas d’un mouvement social et de ses organisations? Le texte présente une typologie qui recouvre potentiellement l’ensemble des conflits urbains, quels que soient les acteurs et actrices qui y participent. Par là, il est possible, entre autres, de mettre en lumière les différents types d’activisme urbain féminin et le rôle crucial des femmes sur la scène urbaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.053
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it