Coastal Engineering Analysis for Airport Improvements, False Pass, AK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A coastal engineering and numerical model (Delft3D) assessment of waves and flow was performed to support the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT&PF) proposed extension of the False Pass Airport runway into Isanotski Strait on the eastern shore of Unimak Island. The objective of this analysis was to provide design current, water level, and preliminary wave parameters for the project site, and to assess potential project impact on tidal circulation and the wave field resulting from the proposed airport runway extension design. This study was executed by analyzing existing data, collecting new water level and acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) data used to successfully validate the numerical model, and simulating 50-year design waves coupled with flow in the vicinity of the Isanotski Strait. Significant wave height simulated with a 50-year design storm range between 0.3 - 1.1 m in the immediate vicinity of the design project extension. Moderate changes in current velocity and circulation are noted near the east side of the runway extension with current speed differences up to ±0.5 m/s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".