MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161959511 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.074005

Study of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math>processes on polarized targets: Quantum environment and its dephasing interaction with particle scattering

2015· article· lv· W2161959511 on OpenAlexaff
M. Švec

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsUnitarityParticle physicsAmplitudeMathematical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unitary evolution law describes isolated particle scattering processes in an empty Minkowski spacetime. We put forward a hypothesis that the physical Universe includes a quantum environment that interacts with some particle scattering and decay processes. While the scattering process is governed by the $S$-matrix dynamics and its conservation laws and unitarity, the interaction with the environment evolves the produced final state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{f}(S)$ to the observed state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{f}(O)$. To be consistent with the Standard Model this new interaction must be a pure dephasing interaction. Governed by a nonunitary evolution law, it modifies the phases of the $S$-matrix amplitudes and can give rise to mixing of such amplitudes to form observed amplitudes. We present the first test of unitary evolution law in particle scattering. Conservation of $P$-parity in strong interactions imposes constraints on partial wave helicity and nucleon transversity amplitudes in $\ensuremath{\pi}N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}N$ processes. An independent set of constraints on these amplitudes is imposed by the $S$-matrix unitary evolution law. The unitary evolution evolves pure initial states into pure final states leading to 9 independent constraints on 16 components of angular intensities in $\ensuremath{\pi}N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}N$ processes. When expressed in terms of parity conserving transversity amplitudes, all 9 constraints are identities provided a single constraint on the transversity amplitudes holds true. The constraint implies that relative phases between transversity amplitudes of the same naturality and transversity must be 0 or $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\pi}$. Assuming a self-consistent set of these unitary phases we use the CERN data on spin observables ${R}_{u}^{0}$ and ${R}_{y}^{0}$ to determine a unique solution for the $S$- and $P$-wave moduli below 1080 MeV. The data require ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}(770)\ensuremath{-}{f}_{0}(980)$ mixing in the $S$-wave but this unitary solution is excluded by data on observables ${R}_{x}^{0}$ within at least 5 standard deviations. All previous amplitude analyses of $\ensuremath{\pi}N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\pi}N$ processes found nonunitary relative phases in an apparent violation of the unitary evolution law. The contrast between the predicted unitary relative phases and the observed nonunitary phases presents unambiguous evidence for the nonunitary evolution of the produced final state and supports the hypothesis of the existence of a quantum environment and its pure dephasing interaction with particle scattering processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207