Les pratiques d’organisation communautaire en CSSS à l’épreuve des programmes de santé publique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’importance croissante des programmes de santé publique dans les CSSS et la contribution de plus en plus systématique des organisateurs communautaires (OC) à leur mise en oeuvre suscitent des questions quant à la pérennité des fondements de l’organisation communautaire dans les établissements publics. À l’aide du cadre conceptuel de l’approche socio-institutionnelle, a été menée une recherche visant à identifier, dans les pratiques d’organisation communautaire et dans les programmes de santé publique, les facteurs qui favorisent et ceux qui freinent la participation des milieux. Tout en reconnaissant le caractère exploratoire de ses conclusions, l’étude fait ressortir l’importance déterminante des territoires de mobilisation, de la gestion des fonds associés aux programmes, et du soutien institutionnel à l’action des OC pour associer à la mise en oeuvre des programmes le milieu et les personnes à rejoindre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".