MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Immigration and the changing Canadian city

2000· article· en· W2162045339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationMetropolitan areaNeighbourhood (mathematics)GeographyEconomic geographySociologyPolitical scienceEconomyEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of immigration on Canadian cities since the Second World War has been profound, especially following the removal of barriers to non‐European immigrants in the 1960s and the significant increase in the number of immigrants admitted since the mid‐1980s. Over two million immigrants entered Canada in the 1990s and the vast majority have settled in just a few metropolitan areas. As a result, the social geography of large Canadian cities has been transformed, an issue that has attracted considerable attention from Canadian geographers. In this paper, research on these changes—published by cultural, social, and urban geographers between 1996 and 1999—is surveyed. This work is exceedingly diverse in emphasis and method, and has contributed a great deal to our understanding of the relationship between immigration and urban change, particularly in the areas of housing, the labour market, and neighbourhood life. In general, geographers are emphasizing the complexity of outcomes, highlighting on the one hand the importance of local contingency, and on the other the growing connections between Canadian cities and global processes. This research challenges traditional theories of immigration and urban structure, and in so doing will redefine the way we conceptualize urban spatial structure and urban social life. L'impact de l'immigration sur les villes canadiennes depuis la seconde guerre mondiale a été profond, particulièrement depuis la suppression des barrières à l'égard des immigrants ne venant pas d'Europe dans les années 1960, et l'augmentation significative du nombre d'immigrants dans les années 1980. Plus de deux millions d'immigrants sont entrés au Canada dans les années 1990, dont la grande majorité s'est installée dans seulement quelques métropoles. Cela a provoqué une transformation de la géographie des grandes villes canadiennes, phénomène qui a attiré une attention considérable de la part des géographes canadiens. Dans cet article, des recherches sur ces changements, publiés par des praticiens des géographies culturelle, sociale et urbaine entre 1996 et 1999, sont passées en revue. Les champs d'investigation et les méthodes de ces travaux sont extrèmement divers. Ces derniers ont grandement contribuéà notre compréhension du rapport entre immigration et changements urbains, particulièrement dans les domaines du logement, du marché du travail, et de la vie de quartier. En général, les géographes mettent l'accent sur la complexité des conséquences, en soulignant d'un côté l'importance de la contingence locale, et de l'autre les relations croissantes entre les villes canadiennes et les processus globaux. Ces recherches remettent en question les théories tradition‐nelles sur l'immigration et la structure urbaine et, chemin faisant, redéfinissent notre façon de conceptualiser la structure spatiale et la vie sociale des villes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it