Performance of RC Beams Strengthened Using Prestressed NSM-CFRP Strips Subjected to Fatigue Loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fatigue performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams strengthened using prestressed Near Surface Mounted (NSM) Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strips was evaluated in this paper. Five full-scale RC beams were tested under fatigue loading simulating in-service loading conditions: one control unstrengthened beam and four beams strengthened using NSM-CFRP strips prestressed to 0, 20, 40, and 60% of the CFRP ultimate tensile strength. All beams were subjected to fatigue loading for 3 million cycles at a frequency of 2.0 Hz such that the stress range induced in the tension steel, during the initial cycle, is 125 MPa as specified by the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. Experimental test results show that the percentage deflection increase at the end of fatigue loading was almost the same for all beams, which implies that damage accumulation is independent from the prestress level. CFRP strain variation at midspan indicated the occurrence of deboning during the initial cycling of beams prestressed to 0 and 20%, whereas no signs of bond degradation were observed in the other beams. Therefore, prestressing the CFRP strips was shown to enhance the bonding properties and results in an overall CFRP strain increase at the completion of the fatigue loading. For all beams, steel and concrete strains and crack widths at midspan increased rapidly in the initial 500 cycles, followed by stabilized linear increase trends for the rest of the fatigue loading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".