A calcium-dependent bacterial surface protein is involved in the attachment of rhizobia to peanut roots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of a project to characterize molecules involved in the crack-entry infection process leading to nodule development, a microscopic assay was used to visualize the attachment of cells of Bradyrhizobium sp. strains SEMIA 6144 and TAL 1000 (labelled by introducing a plasmid expressing constitutively the green fluorescent protein GFP-S65T) to Arachis hypogaea L. (peanut). Qualitative and quantitative results revealed that attachment was strongly dependent on the growth phase of the bacteria. Optimal attachment occurred when bacteria were at the late log or early stationary phase. Cell surface proteins from the Bradyrhizobium sp. strains inhibited the attachment when supplied prior to the attachment assay. Root incubation with a 14-kDa protein (eluted from sodium dodecyl sulphate - gel electrophoresis of the cell surface fraction) prior to the attachment assay resulted in a strong decrease of attachment. The adhesin appeared to be a calcium-binding protein, since cells treated with EDTA were found to be able to bind to adhesin-treated peanut roots. Since this protein has properties identical to those reported for rhicadhesin, we propose that this adhesin is also involved in the attachment process of rhizobia to root legumes that are infected by the crack-entry process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".